ABSTRACT
Introduction Use of condoms to prevent STIs/HIV and unplanned pregnancy remains important during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, it is unknown whether the pandemic affected condom access and which population groups were most impacted. Methods 6658 participants (18-59y) completed a cross-sectional web survey one-year after the initial British lockdown from 23 March 2020. Quota-based sampling and weighting resulted in a sample that was quasi-representative of the British population. We report the prevalence of unmet need for condoms because of the pandemic among sexually-experienced participants aged 18-44 years (n=2869). Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) quantify associations with demographic and behavioural factors. Results Overall, 6.9% of women and 16.2% of men reported unmet need for condoms in the past year because of the pandemic. This was more likely to be reported by participants who: were aged 18-24 years vs. 35-44 (AOR: men 2.25 [95% CI:1.26-4.01], women 2.95[1.42-6.16]);were Black or Black British vs. White (men 2.86 [1.45-5.66], women 1.93 [1.03- 8.30]);reported same-sex sex vs. not (past five years;men 2.85 [1.68-4.86], women 5.00 [2.48-10.08]);or ≥1 new relationships vs. not (past year, men 5.85 [3.55-9.66], women 6.38 [3.24-12.59]). Men, but not women, reporting STIrelated service use (past year) were more likely to report unmet need for condoms compared to men that did not report service use (3.83 [2.18-6.71]). Discussion Unmet need for condoms because of the pandemic was more likely to be reported by populations at higher risk of adverse sexual health outcomes, including STI/HIV transmission. Improved access to free/low-cost condoms is crucial for all.
ABSTRACT
Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic presented challenges to delivery of reproductive health services. To explore effects, we examined patterns of contraceptive use, service access and pregnancy planning in the year following the first UK lockdown. Methods The Natsal-COVID Wave 2 survey was conducted in March-April 2021, one year after the first lockdown began in Britain. We analysed a subset of sexually-active participants aged 18-44 years and described as female at birth. We estimated differences in outcomes by age and markers of vulnerability. We examined changing contraception use, access to and unmet need for contraceptive services, and London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy scores (LMUP;range 0-12). Results Of 1,488 eligible participants, 78.0% were considered at risk of unplanned pregnancies. Of 441 at-risk participants who tried to access contraceptive services, 16.4% faced barriers. Young participants (18-24 years) were most likely to report trying to access contraceptive services (38.4%;(32.2, 45.0);vs 28.4% overall) and to face barriers doing so (OR: 2.87 (1.36, 6.06)). Encountering barriers was more likely among participants reporting no educational qualifications and those reporting symptoms of anxiety or depression. 199 participants reported a pregnancy in the last year. Pregnancies to young participants were less likely to be 'planned' (difference in mean LMUP score: -2.95;(-3.91, -1.99)). Less 'planned' pregnancies were associated with lower social grades and becoming unemployed. Discussion Young and vulnerable participants were more likely to report difficulties accessing reproductive services and less planned pregnancies during the pandemic. In navigating pandemic recovery, sexual health services should consider the needs of these at-risk groups.
ABSTRACT
Introduction Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, STIs disproportionately affected some Black communities. We examined ethnic inequalities in sexual health during the pandemic. Methods Analyses were restricted to England residents aged 18-59. We included 5,240 sexually-experienced participants from Natsal-COVID survey Wave 2 (quasi-representative web panel survey) reporting one-year outcomes from March 2020- April 2021. We estimated weighted proportions and adjusted odds ratios (AORs) between ethnicity and sexual risk behaviour (condomless sex with new partner on first occasion), sexual health service (SHS) use, and unmet need (trying but failing to access SHS). Using GUMCAD national surveillance data from before (March 2019-March 2020) and during (March 2020-March 2021) the pandemic, we compared proportional differences in rates of STI tests and diagnoses by ethnicity. Results Compared to Natsal-COVID participants of White ethnicity, sexual risk behaviour (8%) was higher among participants of Mixed/Other (22%, AOR:2.26 [95% CI 1.08-4.73]) and Asian (15%, 1.58 [1.07-2.35]);SHS use (5%) was higher in Black (20%, 3.04 [1.75-5.28]) and Mixed/Other (20%, 2.64 [1.35-5.14]);and unmet need (2%) was higher in Black (11%, 5.01 [2.26-11.09]) and Asian (5%, 2.33 [1.11-4.90]) ethnicity. In GUMCAD, among people attending SHS, we observed similar reductions of around 50% in testing and diagnoses during the pandemic across different ethnic groups, although the greatest reduction was in people of Asian ethnicity (56% and 52% respectively). Discussion Two independent national data sources showed sexual health inequalities persisted during the first year of the pandemic with evidence of more unmet need among minority ethnicities, but further work is needed to assess whether these worsened.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pre-COVID-19 research highlighted the nursing profession worldwide as being at high risk from symptoms of burnout, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and suicide. The World Health Organization declared a pandemic on 11th March 2020 due to the sustained risk of further global spread of COVID-19. The high healthcare burden associated with COVID-19 has increased nurses' trauma and workload, thereby exacerbating pressure on an already strained workforce and causing additional psychological distress for staff. OBJECTIVES: The Impact of COVID-19 on Nurses (ICON) interview study examined the impacts of the pandemic on frontline nursing staff's psychosocial and emotional wellbeing. DESIGN: Longitudinal qualitative interview study. SETTINGS: Nurses who had completed time 1 and 2 of the ICON survey were sampled to include a range of UK work settings including acute, primary and community care and care homes. Interviewees were purposively sampled for maximum variation to cover a broad range of personal and professional factors, and experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic, including redeployment. METHODS: Nurses participated in qualitative in-depth narrative interviews after the first wave of COVID-19 in July 2020 (n = 27) and again at the beginning of the second wave in December 2020 (n = 25) via video and audio platform software. Rigorous qualitative narrative analysis was undertaken both cross-sectionally (within wave) and longitudinally (cross wave) to explore issues of consistency and change. RESULTS: The terms moral distress, compassion fatigue, burnout and PTSD describe the emotional states reported by the majority of interviewees leading many to consider leaving the profession. Causes of this identified included care delivery challenges; insufficient staff and training; PPE challenges and frustrations. Four themes were identified: (1) 'Deathscapes' and impoverished care (2) Systemic challenges and self-preservation (3) Emotional exhaustion and (4) (Un)helpful support. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses have been deeply affected by what they have experienced and report being forever altered with the impacts of COVID-19 persisting and deeply felt. There is an urgent need to tackle stigma to create a psychologically safe working environment and for a national COVID-19 nursing workforce recovery strategy to help restore nurse's well-being and demonstrate a valuing of the nursing workforce and therefore support retention.